Notices by Stabatha (mirzaba@cybre.space), page 6

@tesseract actually i have to make an addendum here. the point is that tankies dont know as much about what anarchists do as they think. if you put bookchin in front of a tanky it wont turn them into an anarchist. it would just confuse them and make them scoff and ignore it probably.

@tesseract ive never seen an ML criticize municipalist infrastructure. because they dont know what the fuck it is. and if they did, they wouldnt be an ML for very much longer.

@tesseract marxists literally have no idea what they're talking about when they critique anarchism like this. They think that it all exists within the minds of anarchists and like no practical use has been made with their ideas. meanwhile, anarchists are the ones who have made any progress at all for the sake of the proletariat marxists covet, meanwhile the best MLs can do directly is at odds with the welfare of the proletariat, when not in a purely academic setting.

@tesseract That is also another false premise espoused by marxists, the idea that people are calling for everything to be abolished at the same time and have the details worried about later. Anarchists are the people who have actually been putting in ground work for replacements. This is what syndicalist unions do. This is what food not bombs does. this is what anarchist writing and 'praxis' comes down to. People have been trying to foster healthy egalitarian solutions for almost centuries now.

everybody knows youre not a real leftist unless you have played command & conquer red alert and own a ushanka

anna literally claimed that anarchists believe in private property and private armies... lol and people take her seriously

you know i kind of admire the boldness of anna to assume i would even give her a thoughtful response to her tanky nonsense

@tesseract marxists dont mean it so literally when they say that. they're implying that it's a period where they can establish hierarchical systems on the flimsy promise that an unhierarchical and legitimaely socialist (common ownership of the means of production) society could surface at a later time. And it doesn't work like that. Either it's socialist, or it isn't. this is why authoritarian socialism is more appropriately called state capitalism. because its the state that owns the means of production

@anna @mal ew *busts out the can of raid*

DON'T HAVE COW

theres this guy called manko or whatever and basically he wrote the fediverse but for real life. fucked up huh

@Zero_Democracy but they say their version of cops are the good ones so its all good right :thounking:

@Zero_Democracy frankness? that's -10 brownie points from your databanks. so sayeth the rules of the internet.

@Zero_Democracy i have this nasty habit of holding my tongue with certain people still sadly...

@Zero_Democracy u once said to me... you doin something wrong if you aint losing some followers

The one where worf lets a romulan die and almost causes a galactic incident

@lyliawisteria yeah but I mean like a union specifically for mentally ill jobless folk

IWW but for shitheads like me that don't have a job

How could the actor of data handle all the makeup