Notices by Bob Mottram (bob@social.freedombone.net), page 23
Bob Mottram (bob@social.freedombone.net)'s status on Friday, 05-Jan-2018 06:18:26 EST
Bob MottramAnother recruiter trying to persuade me to work on military submarines. Possibly the work might be technically fascinating, but I don't want anything to do with military companies or "cyberwar" or a military chain of command. It would be working against the kind of world I'd like to inhabit, and I expect that soon enough I'd be stuck in a Chelsea Manning, Snowden or even David Kelly type of situation.
@kaniini I'll block instances if they're doing illegal stuff (like child abuse) or block annoying individuals if they're just trying to cause trouble, but apart from that many of these advisories are silly.
It's probably not a good idea to block instances because some users had some bad takes or bad hair days at some time in the past. There will always be disagreements and drama. If you block yourself off from much of the fediverse because of trivial reasons then you'll be missing out on a lot of the value it contains.
It is an interesting thing being on good terms with your past self, and having your past self be on good terms with your current self. The former requires seeing your past self complexly, not just as the idiot you grew out of being but also as the seed of who you are now. The latter involves forgiving yourself your mistakes and also keeping a really close eye on your reasons for doing things.
@gabriele Maybe so. From a Facebook perspective adding a Facecoin would be pretty safe. They could crow about decentralization and so on while also holing on to their pre-mined stash.
@antanicus At present I don't think there's any panacea. All systems have issues. So for example the more powerful ARM boards will be arm64 or aarch64. They all seem to need proprietary boot blobs, and who knows what that does.
There's also the problem that chip designs aren't verifiable. So ARM licenses its designs to OEMs in China. Chip fabbers can add their own custom modifications, and because this is all proprietary none of it is independently checked. There could be additional chip level backdoors which aren't known about.
The ultimate solution is free/open hardware designs which are verifiable, but we're still only at the early beginnings of that.
@aemon These kinds of annual resolutions will be mainly public relations. What he's signalling to share holders is that Facebook is following the latest trends, which currently happens to be decentralization, and that he is going to try to make the site less toxic so that more ads and other BS won't result in user mass exodus.
I very much doubt that Zuckerberg seriously intends to decentralize anything about Facebook.
> Our internal experiments confirm that it is possible to use similar techniques from Web content to read private information between different origins.
Bob Mottram (bob@social.freedombone.net)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jan-2018 13:12:38 EST
Bob MottramZuckerberg's new years resolution is to "think seriously" about decentralization. If he does this then he'll conclude that monoliths are a bad fit for social systems and pretty much kryptonite to good governance and that he'll have to start a different company making something like federated home servers or mesh systems.
AI isn't going to be a get-out clause for the antisocial dumpster fire which is contemporary silo systems.
But of course he can't decentralize without destroying Facebook as we know it. It would knock him out of the top ten oligarch list. This is the glorious part about it all. If he's a smart guy then he'll be able to binocular the iceberg, but he won't be able to stop the Titanic from crashing into it.