@gedvondur I'm a streaming service. I get $5 a month from each user for all-you-can-eat viewing. A cinema chain offers me $1 per viewer per episode, for a license to screen my original content. That's free money. If I turn it down, as well as NOT GETTING FREE MONEY, I risk the death of a business that subsidizes production of a lot of the content I resell. Why would I do that?
@lanodan you could offer group discounts that work out as $20 a season for 10 or more people, which incentivizing people to encourage their friends to commit too, and making the TV experience more sociable. @icedquinn
@ssokolow it's a long and frustrating process and its not inevitable, but it's happening because thousands of people are putting in the work to make it happen. * There's never been more interest in #federated and #P2P replacements for the #datafarms than there has been over the last year, nor more libre community-hosting services springing up. * there is a #libPurple plugin for #Matrix: https://github.com/matrix-org/purple-matrix#readme * Breaking the chip monopoly breaks the remains of the x86/Windows monopoly
@Tutanota Checking your own code is not an audit. An audit, by definition is conducted by third-parties. Users will decide who they trust to audit the client they use with your service, whether it's yours or a third-party one. If what you're doing is transparently secure, rather than depending on #SecurityByObscurity, surely it's based on common protocols, and standard crypto not #RollYourOwn, and has clearly documented specs that third-parties can follow securely. @resist1984
@JayatiGhosh "Notwithstanding the necessity of economic packages, public policy should not be confined to such largesse. We need a new politics around collective obligation for welfare."
@JayatiGhosh It certainly isn't. What the author is describing is #technocracy, which is currently being pushed hard by the corporatist ("neoliberal") centre in multiple countries, as the solution to the rise of #populism in both its right/nationalist and left/socialist forms. I wish more people would pay attention to #Taiwan's model of hybrid democracy, which uses elements of both representative and participatory ("direct") democracy.
@JayatiGhosh "Deliberation, decentralisation and dissent constitute important gains made through democracy ... We are about to lose those — and the irony is that we may lose these of our own volition. A first step in that direction is decisions without consultation; the next is to overemphasise the virtue of quick decisions; the third would be to delegitimise different viewpoints; finally reaching a point of conformity where no dissent is possible. #India may not be alone in this."
If anyone running a cinema business is looking for free ideas, here's mine. Streaming services are eating your lunch. Why not share theirs? I think a lot of people would pay to watch big budget #VFX-heavy series like #TheMandalorian or #TheWitcher at the movies, one episode a week. You'd be wise to focus group it, but I reckon $5 an episode, or $25 for a season ticket would get people out of the house (one we're allowed ;) Can't hurt to try it, right?
I doubt it. The cinema industry had a cunch when #VCR and video libraries became available, but ultimately watching movies at home is no substitute for going to the movies. Cinemas refocused on what movie-goers really wanted and rebounded in two forms; popcorn flick multiplexes for families and teenagers, and arthouse cinemas with cafes for childless couples and older folks.
"… Without end-to-end encryption, Zoom has the technical ability to spy on private video meetings and could be compelled to hand over recordings of meetings to governments or law enforcement in response to legal requests. While other companies like Google, Facebook, and Microsoft publish transparency reports that describe exactly how many government requests for user data they receive from which countries and how many of those they comply with, Zoom does not publish a transparency report. On March 18, human rights group Access Now published an open letter calling on Zoom to release a transparency report to help users understand what the company is doing to protect their data. …"
#ShowerThoughts among the plethora of decentralized software out there, two things are being designed and built; #UX (User eXperiences), and protocols for the exchange of data to make those experiences possible. I suspect that the maturing of (re-)decentralized tech will involve natural selection among the protocols until only a small subset are left in common use (standards are a natural monopoly), and the re-engineering of most of the UX on top of those protocols.
Funny, that's what people used to say about Titter, and before that IRC, and before that, old school BBS networks like #FidoNet. The common denominator is early adopters, it was said about each when they were small populations using relatively unknown platforms.