I fucking love NA, but I will refuse to listen to @adam on Bitcoin until he discloses if he has divested himself of all his bitcoin - which would be worth about half a million right now (I think he had around 60 BTC, if memory serves).
Is it out of bounds in reading this to suggest that Q is saying that Obama may in some say be in control (or attempting to get control) of North Korea, perhaps with those deep in the 3 letter agencies and globalists?
That may be a wild leap, but something is definitely up with BO and NK.
I'm not counting on it and my stake is minimal (as in probably $3,000 invested in crypto), but what makes it different is that it is an "asset" with defined rules and is not a fiat.
You can't make more, it is completely decentralized, and the only real barrier would be legislation on the exchanges - but if we know anything, it's that the bankers would rather take over the exchanges than eliminate them.
This idea of Hefner as a CIA asset is interesting.. >Hef invites over celebs/pols for young tail in a "safe space" >records everything, delivers to CIA >CIA now has celebs/pols by the balls
So on Bitcoin being a bubble - has anything that's been a bubble (tulips, beanie babies, etc) ever been this resilient? It just hit $8200 after dropping to $5500 from the $7000's a couple weeks ago and there are probably 20 other such dips you could point to over the last 5 years.
If anything I think Ethereum could be the bubble because I can't for the life of me wrap my head around the concept.
That being said, I'll hold on to both until one of them can pay off my mortgage.
Found a freshly killed rabbit in the backyard this morning - either a coyote left it or a hawk dropped it - head gone, still bleeding from the decapitation.