True, they could be different. Sadly I haven't been able to find anything concrete on 'red dust' so far except a few references in old interviews, etc. You could consider our mental model to be one simulacra (our senses re-creating the world), our societal communication and relationship as another (we create mirrors of our selves), and technology as yet another (we create new representations of ourselves via media tech). I haven't read Heidegger yet though :)
I wonder if you could use private keys and Merkel Trees to hash and publish your (encrypted) hand in advance, and then validate (public) moves against it as you go, or something. My crypto isn't good enough to know the fine detail.
I wonder if this is like the Chinese concept of "red dust". As in (I think), the red dust of everyday life that gets in our way and stops us from seeing reality clearly.
Failure to discern between the simulacrum of something real and the real thing is not a problem of actually-existing technology that actually works, it's an ontological problem imposed by force of an epistemic consensus.
The problem at the root of all evils of the anglosphere is the idea that you can make your own reality just by wishing it hard enough.
@stigatle not baaaad, getting to watch "proper" TV with the family, but repetitive kids stuff or Minecraft vids for a change. I'm pretty sure "Ginormous Food" is educational somehow. You?