I've seen similar from people importing their follow list (on other instances). Think it might just show that status temporarily while your instance works through the follows little by little in the background.
Ah FFS!!! Waking up this morning to a 'straw poll' to create a board of directors for social.coop which could "make some decisions without having to run through the working group"
So not only a year in and we have a push for centralisation and representation rather than direct participation. Under the guise of 'convenience' and 'efficiency' this move will create a two-tier system where some members will have more power than others.
"blockchains" are very vaguely defined, and cover ground with a lot of useful ideas and a lot of serious costs and tradeoffs. Weighing costs and tradeoffs for your use case: great. Thinking "blockchains will solve everything" without doing analysis on "what do you mean by blockchain" and once you do that "what are the ramifications to the these choices" is... erm...
Nothing is a magic cure-all, not even blockchains.
It depends. Some providers will encrypt at rest, but they hold the key. Protonmail says they encrypt incoming messages with your public key, but you've still got to trust them.
No, the contents would be encrypted between the sender and the server, but then might be sent unencrypted between (one or more) email servers, and might be stored unencrypted by your email provider.
@paralithode Hard agree. I think the Activity Pub model is brilliant because it defines how we can communicate with each other no matter what experience we all have individually.
The next big challenge is migration, but like you said, it's not wholly awful without any formalization of that process.
That is very encouraging. It means we're figuring it out on a micro level. That's the future. A nomadic social media experience that is in the complete control of the user? That's magic.