Notices by Queen Dyspraxia (shoutcacophony@anticapitalist.party), page 16

@some_qualia That's extremely good. I hear June Jordan, Sexton, Plath being invoked -- then she goes further.

Very tight structure, but also, free verse. Almost stream of consciousness. Impressive.

The ending, too.

@cosine agree, let's

@axolotl so i'm not especially shocked that's he's anti-antifa as well. that just sounds like he's mirroring chris hedges tbh

@axolotl especially during 2016, when it was really fucking hard to bridge build, in order to have a discussion about how being ethically opposed to voting is a valid stance *and* the severity of the situation. it was an opportunity to discuss diversity of tactics and having an agreed-upon strategy, but instead, he just came off like a half-baked sellout with tenure

@axolotl i think i recall us talking about his being so heavily emphaized in linguistics, not sure about the rest of it. i started tuning out when he went from pointing out that voting can be a reasonable compromise given outcomes (especially in the u.s.) to sound patrician and whiny about it, which if nothing else, is a good way to get people to not take anything else he says seriously (including myself). white anarchy grandpa isn't a good look or a good take

@axolotl He's definitely knocked a bunch of holes into his credibility among comrades, that's for sure

@a_breakin_glass

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism_rights_movement#/media/File:Autism_spectrum_infinity_awareness_symbol.svg

:autism: :autism: :autism: :autism: :autism: :autism: :autism: :autism:

💃🏽

@er1n sorry that happened

@frickhaditcoming @a_breakin_glass yeah, that's what i figured. he's equating "ho ho, this'll get 'em!" with outcomes. um, my survival isn't really being helped by "gay marriage is an anti-fundamentalist prank, hilarious" here, one, and two: what, are you kidding me?

also, -20 (at least) for conceptualizing fundmentalism on a single axis, regardless of context or intersecting issues/conditions

@frickhaditcoming and, i mean...it's like i can see the logic of that, but the problem is that virtually nothing in that problem set works like that. it's like he grabs liberal talking points and goes off on some "oh damn, please stop talking" tangent.

i can be the queen of tangents, so in that way it's relatable. but concept -> outcome, sort of important tbh, as is "ok, my actual point here is this, apologies" or the like.

@frickhaditcoming i managed to avoid him for years, but seeing his eugencist and pedophilic takes were like "should i close the browser or throw the laptop out the window".