@xahlee Most of the things that suck about computing today have to do with trapping consumers in a consumer relationship, and it's primarily built with open tech. So it's not about the tech, it's about attitude and purpose. A lot of software development today focuses on services to allow rent-type profiting, vs. selling a single license / unit / tool. It's a multiply-distorted market that doesn't allow easy summary or simple judgments, imho.
@xahlee i'd argue that your argument is missing a lot of data. This conversation is happening on layer after layer of open tech, as is much of the industrial world, android mobile phones, etc. From my perspective, Open Source is like Texas Hold 'em, where you have a bit of technology to yourself, and the rest you play face up and share with the community to avoid replicating work pointlessly (like, say, OS, app stack, or big datasource -- wikipedia, wiktionary, archive.org.)
@ChristinaO Maybe rather than coping with the madness, we should be quelling the sources. I found bliss and peace by ejecting the television from the home, ending most news consumption, and ending most social media use (other than Mastadon.) Consequence: happy, focused, untroubled by narratives beyond my control. Tada! Magic!
@Dan_Ramos I think its a matter of degree. Everyone is made of at least a little bit of retard, and everyone's inner retard is entertained by stupid shit. Most of us get by with the occasional animated GIF or, perhaps, braindead programming... but then there are people who made of more retard than normal. They stand in line for signature McDonalds dipping sauces. Or hit people with bike locks in the name of Antifascism.
@Dan_Ramos Adults watching a cartoon fly into a rage over limited edition McDonalds sauce. In other forms, this behavior is demonstrated by people that camp on sidewalks for phones and movie tickets. it's a public mania, but of a particular kind: manias that effect stupid people looking to be effected by a mania. I mean, seriously, they're standing in line for dipping sauce. At McDonalds.
@Combaticus@YoVinnie@yukiame Once upon a time, Apple was pretty good at a designing a desktop, and... remember when MySpace let users customize profiles? There's a certain wisdom in locking down the aesthetic controls. However, for those of us who are "aesthetic engineers," that kind of restriction is patronizing.
@Combaticus@YoVinnie@yukiame Aesthetics matter to me, too. I had a Mac on my desk (usually as an adjunct machine) from the late 1980s to about 2 years ago when I retired my last iMac. Since that time, my entire development (and arts) toolchains are supported under Linux. To meet my aesthetic requirements, the only option is KDE, but I actually like it better than the Mac. Having control over fonts without hacking helps. :-)
@YoVinnie@yukiame@Combaticus RE: Brave test-drive. It has some things I don't like -- the heavy home/new tab page is reminiscent of Vivaldi. This is a 16 core Xeon system -- _nothing_ should hiccup or lag. Brave (and Vivaldi) both do a bit here and there. As a developer, I find not being able to dock the inspector unacceptable. Finally, the Linux-side UI is not as developed or as clean as the Mac/Windows version.
On the plus side: mostly VERY fast. Ad and beacon blocking works VERY well.
@irritable The most effective and least effort a protest movement can be is a boycott.
I'm finding it very interesting that groups that beg for a living (Wikipedia, Mozilla) turn around and give the money the beg to other, less sexy beggars (RiseUp, defending a monkey's ownership of a selfie) as if they're receiving so much inflow that they don't need ours...