Notices by SpookyR (spookyr@noagendasocial.com), page 6

@PhoneBoy i.e. plants aren't everything. they're something.

@PhoneBoy as for plants, tomatoes might do fine with basil, sow thistle and the like... in its preferred environment, of course. might be just fine to feed the bad tomatoes to the chickens... possibly send the chickens into the area prior to planting.

i dunno. i hate modern environmentalism, and along that same vein, veganism and vegetarianism. i'm okay with people not wanting to eat an animal, so long as they're willing to include animals with their plants.

@PhoneBoy hmmm... also, as it stands, nature does fine on its own... however inedible it becomes on its own. but, only mild intervention is really required to make it human edible, and it does just fine responding to human intervention. to properly enable natural cycles is, obviously, less involved with planting plants and more related to "dumping more synergistic actors into an area." cattle aren't synergistic with a forest, after all. but pigs are. and pigs can be eaten.

@PhoneBoy even more interesting, birds don't keep the insect population in check unless there are trees within a certain distance. a random note for huge, tree-less fields.

@PhoneBoy even more interesting, birds don't keep the insect population in check unless there trees within a certain distance. a random note for huge monocultured fields.

@PhoneBoy i've been reading that meat is great, even easier, alternative to tillage... especially in between growing tillage (or even instead of it) on a small plot. i mean, it makes sense that natural cycles would depend on... nature existing. animals are not unrelated actors in cycling and building up soil, and by extension, plants and the ever-present fungus and other things.

@PhoneBoy i want to know why a vegetarian or a vegan would want to eat something resembling meat.

@hippieNdisguise they work. works fine. the pan wasn't on the whole burner.

@jeremiah @xahlee if it's the popular will then it probably doesn't really need a rule anyway... maybe just to have it written down, i guess.

@jeremiah @xahlee btw i meant the formality of "at least look like it should be here" as my rules, not the existing rules. if the area builds some beautiful structures that attest to the area's character for hundreds, thousands maybe (although more characteristic of the old world anyway)... then, yeah, the rules would just be a formality of that will.

as for existing building codes... fuck em. those things can't even handle ambient humidity.

@js290 @xahlee @jeremiah >not exaggerated
re-read what i said.

however, i always do find pragmatic philosophies interesting...

@js290 @xahlee @jeremiah i think material science is a great example of just modelling and tinkering with things without really knowing precisely how all of it works.

@PapaVanTwee peaceniks!! this is war!

@js290 @xahlee @jeremiah i think material science is a great example of just modelling things without really knowing precisely how all of it works.

@js290 @xahlee @jeremiah it sounds exaggerated, but yeah that's pretty much it. the explanation of how something works usually comes far, far after... discovering that it just "works."

@PhoneBoy after all, they do have to -add in flavor- to make it taste palatable, or even like the product it mimics, at all...

@jeremiah er, i mean, they're not running at full capacity.

@PhoneBoy nah, just told that they've seen other people with autism having intestinal issues without some kind of it. dunno. it works for me, i guess. i tried other diets.

@jeremiah the real joke is that they're mostly rentals and the capacity isn't all that great...