I finally did it
I finally unsubscribed from a single high-volume mailing list I wasn't reading
I believe I deserve one of those millennial trophies kthx
I finally did it
I finally unsubscribed from a single high-volume mailing list I wasn't reading
I believe I deserve one of those millennial trophies kthx
@Antanicus I'll be honest :) It took me a long time... and I'm ActivityPub co-editor! We originally brought on @tsyesika because it was clear she understood federation concepts better than I did.
Of course I got it eventually, but I felt I could have gotten it sooner. I'm a very story/example-oriented learner. One goal in writing the ActivityPub overview was to give a story that hopefully made it easier for people to follow it: https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/#Overview
PSA: Don't use the term "dark web". Use the term "private web" instead. Thanks.
I am really excited to see that multiple projects are implementing ActivityPub right now and have excitement behind them.
The fediverse needs multiple implementations. I'm sure we all agree that one email client software or one email server software wouldn't be good. To escape monoculture, a protocol needs multiple happy and healthy implementations.
@profoundlynerdy @HerraBRE I think Namecoin is really too much like DNS to be the *root* naming system. However that doesn't mean Namecoin, something Namecoin-like, or even DNS are entities that should not exist... to the contrary, we will always want naming hubs, but in a petnames system dns and namecoin are equal participants among many.
I heard about Racketscript but hadn't actually tried it. Holy shit: http://rapture.twistedplane.com:8080/
oh yeah I gave a talk on how distributed p2p social games (Massively Multiplayer Online Secure Environments) is "the only logical conclusion to our work" at IIW.... here are the slides: https://dustycloud.org/misc/mmose.pdf
@kaniini @jerry @gargron @lx Yes okay, I understand now. Anyway yes it does do that, and I do think it's the correct behavior. IIRC OStatus and Diaspora do this too
A lot of new people followed me overnight. Hello! Nice to speak to you! Expect a lot of decentralized tech posts, FOSS stuff, obscure-ish programming language stuff (mostly Lisp oriented), and leftie politics.
Damn! Racket has a version of Make https://docs.racket-lang.org/make/overview.html
I've been wanting something like this in Guile for years, why does Racket have everything
Wow the original Common Lisp source code to Reddit is super readable https://github.com/reddit-archive/reddit1.0
The Trump administration wants heavy surveillance over social media of anyone crossing the border: https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/29/politics/immigrants-social-media-information/index.html?sr=fbCNN032918immigrants-social-media-information0127PMVODtop
Folks, the stuff we're working on matters. We need to bring social media underground. Put users in control.
Issue asking for ActivityPub support in GitLab
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/44486
Okay come on, *everyone* must want this
Thanks to @ted for filing it :)
Excited to see Peertube get more attention! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16714453
If you want to see my Libreplanet talk but couldn't make it, here it is: https://media.libreplanet.org/u/libreplanet/m/standardizing-network-freedom/
and here's my slides: https://dustycloud.org/tmp/standardizing-federation.pdf
@lain It's not just politics in this case, there's a structural reason for why it was thought to be a better decision, that ActivityPub should be follow-your-nose/URI centric.
However I think even if it's not in the spec Webfinger can and should and is supported. Something *is* missing, and that's a guide on what the best practice is. But we have a path forward for that: we can document it through the SocialCG.
@lain @ted A) ActivityPub addressing is based on URIs. We don't specify the URI type though obviously https:// is most popular. ActivityPub is web-centric in that way.
B) You can use webfinger theoretically then also by doing acct:foo@bar.example though the RFC for acct: is kinda goofy
@nev @xor wait what's the ruling... link plz! I'm out of the loop!
Here are the slides for the talk I gave at Libreplanet: http://dustycloud.org/tmp/standardizing-federation.pdf
And here is their source code (in Racket's slideshow language!) https://gitlab.com/dustyweb/talks/blob/master/federation/libreplanet_2018/standardizing-federation.rkt
Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.