Show Navigation
Notices by Katze Kattepus :catsader: (nerthos@shitposter.club)
-
Time to not be a piece of shit on the internet all day
-
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Give a cat borgar and you'll have a friend.
-
@georgia @happymoomoo It has some bullshit, but also some good points like "Also, we are told again and again, that not only should men not expect anything of us (not even common decency), but that we should leave any one who places any demands (or requests) on us."Not giving someone a benefit or respectul treatment means not getting it in return, and complaining about this being the case is insane entitlement. People do things for others out of only two reasons: profit or loyalty. Only the latter one is meaningful in the long term, the former requires you to always be the highest bidder, which is impossible. Men naturally understand loyalty and value it more than profit if you prove that you'll reciprocate, which is the bit you tend to leave out of your thought process in your regular "it's only men that care about body/x/y like that" statement. That is the case if no loyalty is established, and it works exactly the same way with roles reversed, just that instead of body it's power. If you want to base your interactions in profit rather than loyalty you'll lose to time, always.The "don't try to compete with men" bit is also on point, men will generally just let you have the thing you want if you ask, if you insist on competing you'll be treated like a man, and women don't realize what that entails and all the unspoken protections it removes. It's like how in the wild west, not carrying a gun meant you were very unlikely to be shot as it was a very serious crime, but if you strapped one on your belt, it was likely you would be shot, as every other gunman treated you as one. It's how you end up "threatened" or "afraid" of men, because you decided you wanted to initiate hostility with them, and they will always respond to provocation.It also leads to the issue of feeling disvantaged in the competition, because let's be honest, a woman with a glued beard will have as much ease in competing against natural born men as a man with a skirt and plastic boobs will have competing against natural born women.Treat men with genuine honesty and don't be dismissive and you'll get the exact same in return, they'll find it a welcome break from the expectation and thus consider it worth the effort to be positive to you. Be dismissive and you can be sure they won't give a crap about you, they don't need to, as you can't use extortion against them when it really matters.The widespread belief that men get from their interactions with women is that they don't care for their feelings or issues yet want their own issues looked after, much like the belief women seem to learn is that men care more about them as objects than as people. Both sides think the other don't see them as real people, act in accordance to the belief, and sabotage themselves.Ignoring these basic rules of interpersonal relations is how the two genders are now fighting like retarded kids instead of getting along, benefitting the people that are actually trying to screw them instead of themselves. Take me as an example if you want, since I'm as clear a case of having 0 empathy for people that don't show any to me as they come, yet treat you as a friend, as evidenced by my typing of this instead of typing "lol get fucked feminist". It's the same with almost everyone who isn't stupid. Unlike with say, commies, this isn't a conflict that can or should be fixed by exterminating the other side, we're mutually dependant and no amount of rethoric on either side will undo that reality.Of course none of this applies to idiots of either gender, avoid those, they're not real people and they're the ones that got us into this mess in the first place.
-
I also got a new graphic tablet so have a tiger I'm drawing
-
"I want fedi to be better than twitter and tumblr" yells the racist sociopath while trying to farm woke points
Leave, that's how you make fedi better. Taking your club of insane creeps back to either of those places. You're what ruins sites, notice the pattern. Wherever you show up, you ruin the party for all the less crazy people that were there before.
-
@vix Unironically, shooting the press would do so much more for USA than any war with Iran ever could. I'm 100% sure that without that bunch of cowards and agitators a mutually beneficial diplomatic solution could be reached in a month or two.
-
@ultem @nepfag @rin After all, all girls on the internet are federal agents
-
long ocelot.jpg
-
Get rid of blocks and force people to call eachother faggots like real men again
-
@kaikatsu because the definition of "harassment" by block happy instances is usually "didn't bother to read my pronoun manifesto" rather than actual harassment.
-
You spent two years blocking everyone
Now the EU blocks you
It is extremely funny, gargron.
-
One side mostly done
20190302_234947.jpg
-
@rice Tell her to fuck off and to stop trying to dictate your life as you're specifically acting opposite to how she would because you'd kill yourself before becoming what she is, and to stop making you look like a retard by asociation.
It doesn't matter if it's true. Works much, much better if it's in public. It'll anger her but also humilliate her and force her to stop if just to save herself the embarassment. It worked for me.
-
@sim @wowaname Mutual trust, support, companionship, attraction and loyalty; compatible life plans and values.
-
@lain @ayy @kro TL;DR if you missed the drama, matrix made a joke instance called gasthe.lgbt
Kaniini's response to it was to call their registar and attempt to get them shut down because he didn't like the meme, as well as post all necessary information for others to do the same and urging them to.
He also admitted to complaining about @sjw's instance and denouncing gameliberty for "holocaust denial"
All because he didn't like a meme.
-
@bendersteed It is definitely an issue, and the reason of much of the GS/Pleroma animosity towards Mastodon. Before 2016 that didn't happen, and the fediverse was around since at least 2008. Previous to that no one really minded what software you used, but Mastodon joined the fediverse with a very agressive marketing campaign and breaking protocols, so the fediverse ended up mostly splitting in two.
I think the real reason for this is that Mastodon was originally marketed for left wing people that wanted an alternative to twitter, while previous to that most of the fediverse was, while somewhat left-leaning, composed majorly of tech-oriented people with the exception of a few instances with a clear theme like rainbowdash.net
Thus, there was beyond the software issues that caused a period of constant server crashes and unintentional DDoSing of non-Mastodon servers that attempted to communicate with Mastodon (which had unilaterally modified the way the activitypub protocol was implemented from all previous software, thus causing overloads on servers that got weird data they couldn't parse, or simply way too much activity at once) a severe ideological and behavioural difference between the general public that used each software. People that have cultivated a mostly STEM campus-like community, with a huge overlap with the classical free software community and are generally open to debate on most topics, having "almost all conversations are open for everyone in any instance to join and give their opinion" as an unwritten rule of interaction really can't get along suddenly with a massive left-twitter migration from the late 2016 political climate. Originally a lot of people from the standing servers tried to interact with the new Mastodon communities like they had been with eachother for years just to be almost universally met with hostility or treated as extremely rude for interjecting into conversations, which in turn made them see Mastodon people as paranoid and prone to gang up on anyone who earned the dislike of one or two Mastodon users or said anything the newcomers didn't like (there's a bunch of screenshots floating around of Gargron himself joining in with a mob to harass @sim for wrongthink). Since many GS servers migrated to Pleroma or had their user set up Pleroma instances, as GS was poorly mantained by that point, the GS-Mastodon culture war ended up turning into Pleroma-Mastodon.
I think the core reason the fediverse reacted like it did is that Mastodon connected to an already established network and decided to do things as it pleased without any sort of consensus with the admins of existing instances on how to handle software issues, and when existing admins confronted Gargron on those software issues what they got was dismissal and insults from the new Mastodon community (which at that point was mostly just .social) and that in turn caused many of the existing communities to reply in kind.
Over time that got flanderized into "pleroma are nazis" and "mastodon are gay tankies" and a general two-way animosity.
And really, you can't blame a community that was mostly drama-free in the bigger picture for 8 years to be upset when someone strongarms their way in and forevermore turns that tranquility into a turf war, and never at an official level says "okay yeah maybe we went about things the wrong way, let's see about making up" nor the newcomers even try to adapt to the existing community, deciding to instead pretend anyone who complains is a nazi. No one likes when someone barges into their neighbourhood and tells them "the way you've acted all your life is wrong, change or we'll kick you out". I'm not going to pretend that there weren't jerks on this side startin fights and "counter trolling" after the "war" sparked, but the inital attempt was to interact and cooperate and it failed.
Katze Kattepus :catsader:
All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the 
