Had a lot of fun recently participating in a "design week" at the #Outlandish co-op in London. It was pretty intense but definitely the best way to spend my first days working with #Moodle as Technical Architect on the #MoodleNet project. The workshops were made all the more interesting and educational by being run using #sociocracy (a consent-based non-hierarchical decisionmaking process): https://outlandish.com/blog/an-outlandish-moodle-design-sprint/
https://p2pfoundation.net/ is anti-capitalist and emerged from open-source practices in one way or another. Likewise FairCoop. Probly more, but those came to mind immediately.
@alxcndr@gabe@mayel@jjg@vfrmedia I seem to remember rms mention it a few times, I think his reasoning for not mentioning it more is that he wanted to pull in people of all strides, even fans of the current system, or proprietary software, and then convince them otherwise.
Anti-capitalism and free software are a perfect match. I would love to see a critique of capitalism emerge from the FLOSS communities. But I would love as well to see anti-capitalists consider FLOSS as a good praxis, not only to fight capitalism now, but also for the post-capitalist era that we need.
@gabe@mayel@jjg@vfrmedia I feel the other way around. FLOSS failed addressing the bigger picture, that is, the source of all the threats against Free Software has been capitalism.
I saw people fight against DRM, against vendor lock in, advocate for federation against silos, build tech against massive surveillance. And yet, very few times I've heard anyone mentioning capitalism as the common denominator here.
Today's news of Microsoft purchasing Github pushed my butt into gear. Set up a self-hosted #Gitlab instance in 20 mins or so. Works perfectly, painless transition thus far.
#FLOSS only exists as it does today because it is susceptible to future capture by capital. Its freedom is predicated on future value. As #Telekommunisten pointed out ages ago, decentralization, GPL, and relentless copying are forks off of this path. There are others as well.
I really hope that the actors involved can start to look to the motivations/interests of each other and think about if there is a way forward together, rather than a split.
Though having said all that - I think given the reasons for the split (differences over governance effectively) this could be a positive long term. Hope #forkofftogether peeps have a look at the #socialcoop model (nascent as it is).
People who "don't see what's the problem with centralisation" or "centralisation doesn't solve everything" are the same people wouldn't see the problem with a train running full steam ahead coming in their direction as long as they could make a profit from standing on the rails track.
(continued) "The option to automatically mirror a repo on different instances, with its identifier being a combination of a canonical URL and backup URLs, would also help with resiliency and decentralisation of dependencies. FWIW, I agree that ActivityPub and ActivityStreams are the standards to build upon for this."
I added a comment about #git federation: "Indeed, it would not be reasonable to sync all content between all instances, but what is very much needed is discoverability of FOSS projects and the ability to cross-follow and cross-post issues with easy authentication, and critically, to seamlessly make pull requests or forks across different instances."
I'd really rather not use any Microsoft tools unless I really have to, but I know there are a ton of folks using GitHub and it's a nice way of connecting with people.