Notices by just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info), page 48
-
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 28-Apr-2022 14:53:56 EDT 
just an actual husbear
@lain In the end, probably the best outcome from applying this principle is that such large estates that cannot be easily patrolled and kept free from unwanted intruders with catapults become more onerous to own than they're otherwise worth due to the risks they expose the owner to, which comes back to favorizing decentralization. -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 28-Apr-2022 14:33:34 EDT
just an actual husbear
@lain Within the metaphors of free association, if someone goes to your backyard, sets up a catapult and starts lobbing rocks at the neighbors, you can expect to get some grief from the neighbors. If you have a reasonable explanation, such as that you are alone, it's a big backyard and were on vacation and could not have possibly noticed and stop the catapult before it started throwing rocks, then I expect they would understand. But if you have a large staff, security cameras everywhere and in the same time period you've expelled tens of people who weren't setting up catapults in your yard, then I think it's not unreasonable to start thinking maybe you should be held responsible for allowing the catapult guy to setup on your land. -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 28-Apr-2022 14:16:18 EDT
just an actual husbear
@lain I agree in the sense that free association is the superior principle here, but with one caveat that I simply do not think the current hypocrisy of "we can't be expected to be responsible for user content, it's impossible without drastic measures!", and then proceeding to heavily curate user content anyway should be tolerated. Within the context of the state and legal system being here and probably being here for the foreseeable future, I expect and demand consistency. -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 28-Apr-2022 11:07:38 EDT
just an actual husbear
In the future there will only be three approved types of video games:
open-world action-adventure games with crafting mechanics
games-as-a-service shooters with character abilities and loot boxes
metroidvania roguelites -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 28-Apr-2022 10:21:32 EDT
just an actual husbear
@lain Establishing a moratorium on usage of the word "embargo" -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 28-Apr-2022 09:39:41 EDT
just an actual husbear
@Mitsu
749dc9dfe2559f53aa1e466a9af3c60…
hqdefault.jpg
GettyImages-586714878.jpg -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Apr-2022 22:18:38 EDT
just an actual husbear
@lain @ademan
Husky_1651112318214_P0W036IU4J.… -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Apr-2022 22:07:06 EDT
just an actual husbear
@coolboymew @Moon Oui oui, tu m'as bien compris! Il y a des gens qui appellent les chocolatines des "pains au chocolat" ici. :rainbow_puke: -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Apr-2022 22:04:12 EDT
just an actual husbear
@lnxw48a1 I think I heard them mention Baltimore -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Apr-2022 21:28:42 EDT
just an actual husbear
@lnxw48a1 Oh, I was going by this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1979_oil_crisis I don't think the segment mentionned a year, but it mentioned President Carter, so I assumed this was the one they were talking about -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Apr-2022 21:17:47 EDT
just an actual husbear
Ok, now they're showing parts of the news talking about the 79 gas shortage. :blob_grinning_sweat: -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Apr-2022 21:04:19 EDT
just an actual husbear
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o9Qc7qIQsdU%E2%80%8B&t=400
>world renowned sex expert John Money
Even in the past, there is no escaping, is there? -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Apr-2022 20:55:14 EDT
just an actual husbear
Time for another old commercials binge (nothing else interesting in my queue)
https://youtu.be/o9Qc7qIQsdU -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Apr-2022 20:49:39 EDT
just an actual husbear
@Moon I know that feel, I can't believe there are actual "pain au chocolat" apologists around -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Apr-2022 17:58:24 EDT
just an actual husbear
It's called chocolatine because it's filled with chocolate and it's enjoyed by people talking latin languages -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Apr-2022 17:32:19 EDT
just an actual husbear
@lain @Moon The chains they use to make these "blockchains" are the same they used to keep slaves in. -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Apr-2022 17:02:15 EDT
just an actual husbear
@shmibs @Moon @ademan @conti @helene >only applies to big corporations
You don't really have to, you could easily modulate the expectation of moderation in a good faith clauses to the ability of the party in question. The ability of a small blog or small fedi server to moderate content that opens them to liability is not the same as that of a big corporation. While infringing content could be reasonably left for a week on a small blog because the only moderator is on vacation and couldn't be expected to remove it, a large corporation with a staff that's watching 24/7 wouldn't be given the same benefit of the doubt if they ignored for a week something that's been flagged for their moderators to look at (I guess unless they can give a really good reason as to why no one had a chance to take it down).
Another possible type of moderation that I could see granting for companies that chose to be conduits for speech rather than curators, is that of off-topic speech, provided the scope of what is on-topic is clearly delineated and that the application of the moderation is not fickle but even-handed. If a site wants to be an echo chamber, they have to own it, say it, and apply it fairly. -
just an actual husbear (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Apr-2022 16:45:15 EDT
just an actual husbear
@shmibs @Moon @ademan @conti @helene >even though i'm off at work and can't watch the thing all day constantly
That used to be the case, but now they do have the tools and the manpower to keep watch essentially 24/7, they keep demonstrating it every day. Good faith clauses could also be given, providing them with reasonable chance to do moderate speech that opens them to liability.
I know this this would suck, I don't WANT them to take this route, and I don't think they would, but to avoid the charge that this is forcing companies to act like a government, they have to be given that option.
I would much rather they decide to broadly allow content that is legal and not breaking the site on a technical basis and avoid all this. It's really not that hard for them to be; just don't hire activists to do your moderation, fire them when you catch them doing politically motivated moderation.
All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the 
