@Wolf480pl@octobyte@angristan Lets just say that if you conduct due dilligence then the PR from Mozilla doesn't exactly match up with what's going on with their business model.
I'm not really sure about what role the foundation plays, but the corporation employs 1000+ people and you have to then ask where their salaries come from. If you follow the money and start reading the source code and forums it becomes quite a rabbit hole.
Bottom line is that there is currently no browser panacea. All the main browsers which most people use are ethically compromised in one way or another.
RSS doesn't need more machine learning. It doesn't need "algorithms". It doesn't need a business model. It doesn't need to be friendly towards tracking and monitoring user behavior. It absolutely shouldn't care about branding.
Really RSS should just be about reading, and nothing else. The client can do fancy processing of feeds, but the protocol doesn't need to care about that.
@Angle Capitalism still contains some elements from feudalism. Companies, unless they're coops, are just smaller feudal domains. "Don't toil for the Lord, be your own Lord" would be the catchphrase for early capitalism. So it may be that whatever comes after capitalism - some sort of cooperative commons based society based on peer production - also contains some elements of the previous paradigm.
This is related to what I called in the past "the fallacy of metrics". The engineering approach works well when designing an engine, but when the same methods are applied to social relations there can be a lot of bad consequences.
@jz Well it's nice to see the rest of the internet catching up. For a while I seemed to be the only Signal complainer, and that's because not long after it was first released I wanted to try running it myself (including the server side) and then encountered the problems you've listed. There was also a hostile reaction towards LibreSignal.
On the upside, Signal probably is better than WhatsApp or Telegram.
I posted a link to that interview yesterday, and that was one of the surprising comments. His view was that although he's Jewish and finds it abhorrent, holocaust denial should still be acceptable on Facebook because "people should be allowed to be wrong on the internet".
Actually I don't think that flag will fly in the EU - despite recent political trends - and he is likely to encounter more trouble if he continues with this policy.
This is revealing of a weakness of Facebook which could be its eventual undoing. Facebook presently doesn't know how to do community based moderation. Zuckerberg thinks he can do it by hiring a few more censors and relying upon AI, but I don't think that's going to work out.