@kaniini@dansup@mmn@Gargron I'd just like to interject. It was Qvitter which started the wave of expansion of the fediverse. In the Twitter exodus of Feb 2016 people searched for a Twitter alternative and found Qvitter and the few Quitter sites. For a while my timeline was going crazy and it was at that point I realized that some kind of filtering was needed. Sites like shitposter.club started at that time. About a year later something similar happened with Mastodon.
Software development has its pluses and minuses in terms of the specifics, but I've always loved software as a creative medium. As Joseph Weizenbaum once said, software is an infinite universe of possibilities only a tiny corner of which has been explored so far.
Wait...Does this mean that Docker is not the scorching hot ubertech it was made out to be and that my stubborn insistence upon bare metal and minimum complexity was right all along?
Well actually I don't think this is FUD. It's not necessary to collect system specifications from every Ubuntu install in order to improve software. Even if Canonical isn't going to fingerprint users and track them it's not a good idea to collect data which can be later maybe sold and abused in that way.
Actually also I think it's Canonical that's "poisoning the well" here. Free Software isn't supposed to be about reporting back to the mothership. Canonical has no natural or other right to collect data about its users, and it shouldn't be behaving like a surveillance capitalist. Instead, it should be setting a better example of respect for users.
@hamishcampbell Although this might seem like a success story I'm wary of the sustainability of giant sites like this. I used to call them megaservers. It would be better to have a federation of smaller sites. This puts less financial and moderation stress on admins and avoids creating a single point of failure.
@rysiek@xrevan86 This is what #freedombone is about, but also ejabberd and prosody need to ship with a default set of xeps which pass all the Conversations tests. If that happened life would be easier.
@karasu@mulander Some debrief on this might be useful. Even if there were a significant bug in PGP there's a calculation to be made as to how likely it is to be exploited in the wild versus the security advantages. Telling people to turn off or uninstall encryption is really bad advice, which indicates to me that even people at EFF don't have much of a sense of threat models. It took a lot of effort to get anyone to encrypt their email, so throwing that all away based upon an insubstantial claim is quite awful.
"Our advice, which mirrors that of the researchers, is to immediately disable and/or uninstall tools that automatically decrypt PGP-encrypted email."
I think this was actually an irresponsible statement, and there's some meta-analysis to be done on how this case was handled. I expect that EFF was given exaggerated/alarmist information.