@jerry@rysiek@Aaron I have a feeling that right now, SMTP has the biggest adoption of all federated messagning protocols, and the second place is far far behind. Of all the new communication protocols I've seen recently, they're either popular, or federated, not both. And trying to get your new protocol adopted not just by people for their private communications, but also by companies, govts, and orgs for their internal and external communication is going to be extremely hard.
@Shamar@Ashrand Depends how you define the word "hostile". Maybe a better word would be sth like "threatened" or "defensive". The point is, they may bark at you, but that's because you're trying to impose your will on them, and they have the very right to be angry about it.
@Shamar@Ashrand Also, I think that no matter what you do, whether it's art or craft, it's important that you have control on the outcome. If you intend to draw an unintelligible shape, and you draw an unintelligible shape, then you can call it art. But if you indend to draw a square, but instead you draw an unintelligible shape, because you can't control your hand... I wouldn't say it's art.
@Ashrand@Shamar@red@h Then there's a leap to coming up with your own programs that do what you want, or coming up with your own songs. Then there's a lot of practice till you can reach the level that lets you deal with the complexity of some widely known songs/programs out there. Am I wrong?
@Ashrand@Shamar@red@h Ok, children make drawings which are art. And it's not about fame. But the horrible sound that appears when I try to sing, not hearing myself properly, and having no idea what's out-of-tune and what's not, IMO is not art. And a text file that doens't compile isn't a computer program. Now, one can learn to write programs that compile, or to sing not out-of-tune.
@Ashrand@Shamar@red@h >art is not exclusive I doubt this. I doubt that any random person who doesn't notice when they're singing out-of-tune can become a music star, especially without years of practice.
@Shamar@red I think this is an important point, but it goes back to the idea that a small programmer base relative to userbase only adds pressure to developers and provokes resentment, it's a problem a lot of FOSS runs into as it gets bigger and it's part of the reason lots of projects mature to a certain point and then slow down. The Developer : User ratio skews too far in one direction as the codebase becomes more complex.
@red@Ashrand@Shamar IMO if one of the goals of the project is teaching people to rely on OOM killer instaed of looking at RAM usage (which, for i3status, was apparently the case) then not accepting the feature was justified. I don't agree with this project goal tho.
@kurisu@Sir_Boops maybe you need a convention then? IMO this will be needed sooner or later anyway, the sooner you standardize it across build tools the better.