I agree. There always is a fine line between unethical imitation and ethical reuse/remix/inspiration, especially because of the power dynamics you mentioned earlier. And neither the truncated quote nor the original quote address this, which makes them both cool sounding but practically limited.
I agree with you about the power dynamics, but I would argue that practicing a song by someone else isn't imitation. Practice and cover both adequately give credit to the original author. Imitation supposes a lack of proper attribution.
I don't feel the truncated quote is about paying homage. In my experience it's been used as a cop out when presented with similarities with earlier work. There is a difference between imitation and inspiration and this quote doesn't adequately address the latter which you are referring to.
For convenience. A desktop computer physically occupies space in an apartment that you can’t reclaim by folding and stowing it. It’s difficult to temporarily move rooms too.
I'm with you, I don't like these reductive idioms but I like even less when they are truncated from the original quote. This quote is obviously pretty smug and very proud of itself, but at least it's complete.
♲ @KoriOtter@twitter.com: @BobWieting@ChelseaHerps That’s only half of that quote. The whole thing is “Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery that mediocrity can pay to greatness.” Imitation is petty and small. Especially so when it systemically undercuts the work of Black creators.
It isn't that bad, but it definitely is unexpected. Until recently, caring for him was mostly about logistics. Diapers, food, school, etc... But now that he is developing his own personality, I'm starting to get attached to him as a distinct person and now I'm missing him.
♲ @mruef@twitter.com: Full phone number database of #Clubhouse is up for sale on the #Darknet. It contains 3.8 billion phone numbers. These are not just members but also people in contact lists that were synced. Chances are high that you are listed even if you haven't had a Clubhouse login.
The very term “SJW” was created by American conservatives to mock left-leaning militants, so “right-leaning SJW” doesn’t make sense. Even your “aren't [you] considering that there's just as many on the right wing that will destroy somebody” is off since this is exactly what the reported anecdote is about. A conservative Catholic publication outed a priest as gay using his location data provided by Grindr through a third-party.
So you definitely should stop using “SJW” if you meant “people out to ruin lives over sexuality”, especially if they are leaning right like you seemed to have failed to identify in the reported story.
You do understand that mentioning SJWs when someone's location data was used to out them as gay is entirely uncalled for, right? Consider this a warning, I will not tolerate people rambling about things they have no idea about on my posts.