Stand in solidarity with your favorite demonetized YouTuber,
watch NOTHING
upload NOTHING
December 10th-13th
Stand in solidarity with your favorite demonetized YouTuber,
watch NOTHING
upload NOTHING
December 10th-13th
@publius I think you're kind of missing the point of UBI. If you peg it to the Cost of Living and increase taxes on the wealthy every time the UBI payment has to go up, there's a strong class disincentive to keep the CoL from rising too fast, to prevent it from driving inflation (which hits those with largest savings the most). The whole point of making it universal is to prevent the punitive creep of means-tested welfare benefits. Everybody gets it, no matter what. Period.
@dsfgs
@tagomago did you read the whole thread?
@wizard at the risk of being pedantic, hackers have mainly been advocating not for moving to GitLab.com, but moving to community-hosting of #GitLab (or other code forge software like #Gogs, #Gitea, #Kallithea etc):
http://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/List_of_Community-Hosted_Code_Forge_Instances
@jamey ah, OK, I must have missed the link when I first looked at your post. Fascinating discussion. One thing I'd add is that in some countries, like #NZ, solidarity strikes are illegal, so trade union members doing different jobs in the same workplaces can't legally support each others' strikes. The #NZ union movement was traditionally organized by trade unions, but has been moving to a more industrial strategy to deal with this, led by newer unions like #Unite.
#HatTip to @jamesmullarkey for drawing my attention to the website carbon footprint calculator, which in turn drew my attention to the Nature article:
https://www.websitecarbon.com/how-does-it-work/
@jamey good question. Here's my take. An #IndustrialUnion covers all workers in a given industry, regardless of what they do. Whereas a #TradeUnion covers all workers doing a particular kind of work. So an industrial union covering the aviation industry would include the secretaries, whereas trade unions covering the same workplaces would have mechanics in an engineers union, secretaries in a clerical union etc.
Coal (and nuclear) power plants are an environmentally destructive way to produce heat, to turn water into steam, to produce electricity. Servers produce heat as waste, and run on electricity. What if servers could be cooled by turning water into steam, generating electricity, that could be fed back to the servers? There would still be some energy cost even with the closed loop, but it would remove the need for electricity-guzzling AC to cool datacentres.
This 2018 article in #Nature examines the energy costs and environmental effects of the net:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06610-y
Yup, got that @bhaugen. I was doing the same :)
@richdecibels @nicksellen @wu_lee @mike_hales @protean
@jamesmullarkey thanks a lot!
In fact I would say that the Tumblr policy changes were an even earlier sign of the same chilling effects.
@nicksellen all power to you. I've been a professional volunteer for 20 years, living a life of voluntary simplicity, funded by a drip-feed of social welfare benefits. I admire anyone willing to do stuff like this. But the results are in. There aren't enough of us willing or able to do this stuff for the digital commons to outcompete the corporate #datafarms. New strategies are needed for supporting the commons tech workforce.
"Ships that sail the seas of meaning must be: collaborative; creative; improvised; intimate; disposable; beautiful; and spiritual."
- Chapman again
"Twitter, like GTD [#GettingThingsDone], fails to provides tools for fitting meaning-morsels together into creative assemblages of higher value."
- #DavidChapman
https://vividness.live/2013/03/06/meanwhile-back-at-the-charnel-ground/#future
What might those tools look like? What exactly would they allow us to do that current social media tools don't? How could they work to help us make meaning together?
Half a year ago, I put this site on the back burner. I’ll explain why, and what I may do here next, at the end of this page.
First, I’d like to advertise writing I’m doing on two other sites. If you are following only this one, you might find those interesting as well.
“Meanwhile, back at the charnel ground” refers to Buddhism for Vampires. One of my most popular posts here was “Charnel ground,” about the Buddhist practice of viewing all reality as a horror movie. Buddhism for Vampires is a humorous (and sometimes horrifying) take on charnel ground practice.
I’ve recently published there:
“The Buddha and the necrophiliac witch,” about what it means to be a Buddhist hero—or heroine—and, particularly, what it means to be a Tantric Buddhist heroine.
“Take me to the vetali!,” an episode of my serial, philosophical, Tantric Buddhist vampire romance novel The Vetali’s Gift. The new episode is the first in which the vampire theme of the novel becomes entirely explicit.
Two light-hearted philosophical commentaries on that episode: “A philosophical zombie” and “Can we hunt p-zombies with fMRI?”.
A five-part series on “Dark culture and tantric transformation,” subtitled “The emotional dynamics of black magic.” It is about taboos, transgression, transformation, and—ultimately—art. (So, it is also implicitly a commentary on The Vetali’s Gift itself.)
Meaningness is a book about different ways we can approach core questions of meaning, such as purpose, meaninglessness, self, value, and ethics. I’m writing it bit by bit on the web, making the book an interactive, community experience.
Currently I’m writing about monism, the idea that All is One—which often is supposed to imply also that you are God. Monism is common in modern Buddhism. I think it’s mostly factually wrong, and also harmful, both to individuals and social groups. It is not entirely wrong, though, and its opposite (dualism) is equally wrong. Still, I am deeply concerned about its influence on Buddhism, which was mostly anti-monist for most of its history.
I recently published “Unity and diversity,” an introduction to monism, dualism, and the third alternative I advocate (“participation”). There is a schematic overview that outlines the whole discussion. And then I’ve published “Boundaries, objects, and connections,” which begins to explain the fundamental, mistaken intuitions that underlie monism and dualism.
On this site, I was working on “Reinventing Buddhist Tantra.” After a year’s work, I had not quite yet finished the introductory overview to the series. At that rate, according to my outline, the project would take five years.
“Reinventing Buddhist Tantra” was a part of the “Consensus Buddhism” topic—about which I have much more to say.
And that was meant to be a preliminary to explaining ideas about where Buddhism may need to head in the future. That is what I care about most. Everything I have written on this site was preliminaries intended to help diagnose American Buddhism’s current difficulties, and as background for new possibilities. I find all those preliminaries interesting for their own sakes as well, and it’s painful to abandon them. Life is short, however, and I fear I will never have time to write them up.
So, tentatively, I expect to scrap everything I had planed to write here—the elaborate outline and drafts of many posts in various stages of completion—in order to cut to the chase and talk about the future.
To force myself to be concise, I recently summarized parts of that as a series of tweets. Here they are:
The distinctive spiritual feature of our era is the atomization of culture, society, and our selves into tiny fragments of meaning.
Twitter is the perfect example and metaphor for contemporary meaningness. So what is living inside twitter like? Where are our problems?
Central problem of our time: overwhelmingly too much meaning, delivered in tasty 140-character bites. How do we make sense of all that?
Those stuck in the 20th century might say that twitter is devoid of meaning, because it has no ULTIMATE meaning; but that is nonsense.
The key spiritual problem of the 20th century was fear of nihilism: that maybe life has no meaning AT ALL. That now seems silly.
Still, the -isms, great glass cathedrals of meanings, DID implode, shattering in the black flood of nihilism, materialism, and skepticism.
We risk drowning in a sea of meaning, or at minimum drifting without direction. We must assemble meaningness-crafts to navigate this ocean.
Our lives are so full of so many tiny tasty things that they may fail to add up to much. New -isms are hopeless, yet we need organization.
GTD attempts to organize the fragments of our selves and world, but it is more part of the problem than a solution.
GTD’s axes of organization mainly fail to capture what we find most important, and so enables efficient pursuit of lesser-value goals.
Twitter, like GTD, fails to provides tools for fitting meaning-morsels together into creative assemblages of higher value.
Atomization of meaning does not imply that every tweet is of equal worth, nor that larger meaning-structures are obsolete.
Finding or creating a consistent, coherent, universal culture, society, or self is NOT our task; that is the doomed dream of modernism.
Our new spiritual task is to devise diverse watercraft for sailing the turbulent seas of meaning. Not great -isms, but elegant windjammers.
Ships that sail the seas of meaning must be: collaborative; creative; improvised; intimate; disposable; beautiful; and spiritual.
Less poetically, meaningness-crafts are fluid, shared structures that organize meanings in ways that foreground whatever matters most.
The keel of a meaning-sailing ship might be a web tool; the planks, a social group; the sails, collaborative artistic creations.
We are already doing this! A deliberately silly example: I Can Haz Cheezburger has all the required features (listed in n–3 tweet).
Many quite different types of meaning-ocean-going vessels are imaginable; experimentation will find the most capable forms.
http://ow.ly/i21mt summarizes my understanding of the changes in the way we’ve related to meaningness over the past few decades.
http://ow.ly/i21mt is the outline for an upcoming series of a dozen blog posts detailing these changes in culture, society, and the self.
http://ow.ly/i21mt includes: how Buddhism has evolved in reaction to changes in meaningness, and brief speculation about its future.
This barrage of tweets has been an experiment in abusing the twitter form. Comments on style as well as substance are welcome!
Instead the #NZ plastics industry is promoting recyclable plastics, which can only be recycled so many times before ending up in landfill anyway. That's even if every single piece is successfully collected, not littered into the environment. #Compostable packaging is a no-brainer.
"Countdown [supermarkets] has ruled out compostable plastics because they can't be disposed of properly"
https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/2018725998/chief-science-advisor-recommends-plan-to-phase-out-plastic
Umm ... compost them?
“More information continues to surface that trees may be far more connected than we thought. Forest ecologist Suzanne Simard of The University of British Colombia gave a TED talk in June, during which she detailed research that shows mother trees recognize their kin. At a time when an increasing number of people are disconnected from the natural world, Simard hoped to persuade the audience to think differently about forests.”
How will drug driving will be controlled on New Zealand streets if cannabis is *not* legalised in next year's #referendum? There are irresponsible people driving while impaired now (often by more dangerous drugs like alcohol), and that's likely to continue whether cannabis is legalized or not.
#MakeItLegal
"Critics of the #cannabis legalisation bill are concerned about how drug driving will be controlled on New Zealand streets if the drug is legalised in next year's referendum":
https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/2018726011/oregon-police-sergeant-on-how-to-find-drugged-drivers
Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.