Notices by Elly, nasty enby :heart_pan: (elizafox@mst3k.interlinked.me), page 27

@DeeUnderscore n--yes.

ꙮ_ꙮ

At least, the order in which they're run. But if you have such dependencies, don't rely on them. At all.

lol the static initialisation order fiasco

when will people learn not to rely on static initialisers...

@garbados this tube says "non-toxic"

oh you said masculinity, not mascara.

alas, I don't :(

No one under the age of 25 will remember those old X10 Internet ads in the early 00's .

@amsomniac that damn company back in the early 00's with their ads ruined it I tell you.

@meena You know what if 20 live cobras show up on my doorstep because Google spited me, then that's how it'll be. I will happily become a martyr

@meena Androgynous. I'll record it sometime.

I still own these smart speakers in my bedroom cause you know what if Google wants to listen to me have sex fucking go right on ahead you disgusting fucks.

@Aerdan Fantastic, another barrier to adoption.

@dr1ft @amic no it's not get in the shower and wash your ass out astra

So right now due to this attitude that most people who dislike home automation seem to have, I'm literally stuck with a thermostat made by a Google-owned company and smart speakers from Google. All because I want to change the temperature in my house or dim the lights.

Saying "just turn off the lights yourself" or "get up and change the thermostat" is ableist af. Way to assume I can get up out of bed. I don't like depending on my wife for everything.

Wanting home automation isn't inherently Capitalistic and is in fact imo an important part of having full automation. It also brings serious advantages to the disabled. I'm too tired to even leave the bed some days (thanks, thyroid), but I can at least make myself comfortable with my voice or my phone.

The real issue is that a handful of companies control it right now. Which is *horse shit.* But no one seems to be worrying about making open and *viable* alternatives.