Show Navigation
Notices by Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) (lxo@gnusocial.net), page 77
-
I'm told grampa used to say that if you didn't have at least a dozen in a meal, you were not a real man
young already-fat me never thought much of it, a dozen didn't seem much back then, and nowadays it would be a breeze. I'm big, but I'm not two! I'm more like four or five in one ;-)
-
isn't gift-bringing santa a remake of the biblical Magi?
my "favorite" depiction of the nativity had a crucifix hanging on the wall. I could never tell whether it was brilliantly ironic or a religious slip
-
apt install python3-qrcode
-
uau, isso é reclassificação taxonômica "recente"?
(tipo nos últimos 30-40 anos)
vivendo e aprendendo...
-
marcas registradas están limitadas en jurisdición y en linea de actuación comercial. el término apple, por ejemplo, se usa por una compañía que hace computadoras, y por otra de publicación de música, y ambas coexistieron sin problemas hasta que la apple de las computadoras empezó a tratar de publicar música.
¿acaso ese sitio presenta situación similar, de actuación en un mismo mercado?
-
sigo diciendo lo mismo: bloquear Tor por defecto es malo, y consejar que se lo haga sin resaltar que es malo si no es temporal alimenta a las campañas que tratan de atacar a la privacidad de la gente, pero si alguien siente necesidad de un bloqueo temporal para defenderse, bloquée lo que desee. aún me parece que bloquear todos los nodos de salida Tor es demasiado, pero si bloqueos dinámicos no resultan eficaces, un bloqueo temporal de Tor posiblemente lo sea, y no será demasiado problemático para los que necesitan Tor si no logran acceder a un sólo sitio por algún tiempo. pero si se lo hace permanente, y se recomenda que se lo haga por defecto, resultará que Tor no será usable para acceder a mucho más del Internet, lo que me parece muy indeseable
-
besides, people who don't get vaccinated are less likely to seek medical attention just for a diagnosis, unless they get serious symptoms. if they avoid the vaccine, they probably also get out of their way to avoid getting tested. I guess this is the most likely reason for these unexpected numbers
-
.oO que a celebração do aniversário, da consciência e da história de luta de Zumbi dos Palmares inspire muitas pessoas mais a lutar por liberdade e igualdade, sejam elas vítimas de algum tipo de discriminação ou não
-
#GNU #Linux-libre 5.15.3-gnu (with updated scripts), 5.14.20-gnu, and 5.10.80-gnu1 sources, tarballs and patches, and #Freesh .debs have been available for a while already. there are even #Freed-ora rpms of 5.14.20-gnu in -detesting already
-
I'm not sure whether that's true or false ;-)
-
así es. no hay libertad ahí, no hay "trabajar bien" sino bien para el señor que elijas. ambos son trampas.
¿percibes que lo que contestaste no tiene relación con lo que escribí yo? puede que sea tu racionalización para aceptar los abusos, pero no los elimina. de hecho, los extiende a las víctimas de otro sistema operativo. ¿acaso te parece que esté bien así?
mira, no ataco a tí, que eres víctima, sino a apple (y a google), que son los abusadores. pero si te pones a defenderlos... me parece raro
-
I look forward to libre-soc.org-based products
-
I don't know the answers to any of these questions.
wouldn't the implied argument disqualify me from participating in any conversations about vaccines?
-
hmm, maybe what you're saying XMPP is missing is a catchy name for the concept, somethiyoung analogous to "web", to "fediverse"?
-
and nobody's telling people to install XMPPChat, right? people talk about gajim and conversations and pidgin and whatnot, and all of them implement the XMPP protocol. which is analogous to recommending icecat or abrowser to access HTTP servers.
so what's your point?
-
if you think the service and the food don't provide you with any value, how come you even pay for them? even if the value they provide just cancel out natural (or artificial) decay, it's still value that you recognize when you pay for it. though I'll oversimplify, they're still worth the congealed human labor that went into them. you may want to refer to the canonical book that economists of all leanings, and interested laypeople resort to to understand the notion of value: volume I of The Capital, by Karl Marx. nevermind the propaganda about his political inclinations, it's as objective and scientific an analysis as one could possibly hope for, and it's quite accessible too. whether or not you support his activism, it was spelled out elsewhere
-
I reject the notion that contributors should pick privileges when it comes to licensing. when it comes to express agreements between multinational corporations, a choice of jurisdiction is due diligence, but when it comes to free software licensing to the general public, the primary goal is to respect users' freedoms, not defend developers' privileges. depriving users of freedom to defend their rights in their own jurisdictions, even if it could be fit in a licensing arrangement, doesn't seem to be in line with the primary goal
-
es decir, trabajas para apple, pero no te pagan. al reves, tú les pagas. y aunque creas que tienes un iPhone, él sigue obediente a su real dueño :-(
-
whose "one meal"? :-)
-
doido, né? amiga minha, brasileira, foi morar na suíça e se declarou católica nalgum formulário, ainda que jamais tivesse sido praticante. resultado: pagou imposto pra sustentar as forças armadas que protegem o papa, que os habitantes católicos da suíça sustentam com esse imposto
Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)
All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the