I'm not sure you can _legally_ exclude military recruiters from recruiting on campus as long as you allow others (educational institutions, employers) to do so.
As for whether joining the military is ever the right decision, there are some people where it is the right decision. #sonOne, for example, came back with training and experience he never could have obtained with the available resources. I disagreed vehemently with his decision and it cost us six years of silence. But it turned out that I was wrong, and I admit it.
I admit that they seek more infantry cannon fodder than avionics engineers, and most such folks return home after their enlistment having no marketable skills, often nothing saved in the military college fund, and having undertaken life/health risk of being sent into a war. So it does not benefit every soldier directly. But is that the only criterion? Don't we also care about getting people to benefit their families and society in general? How would we even know in advance which people would benefit?
lnxw48a1 (lnxw48a1@nu.federati.net)'s status on Thursday, 19-Oct-2023 16:32:32 EDT
lnxw48a1In light of the recent massacre, I've had time to think about guns again. The last time I touched a firearm was when I was around 14 and an adult gang member came barging into the family home. I picked up the family pistol and pointed it at him. He realized that I really would shoot him if he did not retreat. He backed out of the door and exited the property.
After the fact, I determined that I did not want to deal with the after-incident emotions related to possibly killing someone. (I should note that the gang member didn't learn from this experience. He tried again at least twice. One of my brothers likewise grabbed the gun and sent the guy fleeing both times.)
Many decades later, there's no "let $BROTHER handle it". If a situation arose in which an intruder threatened my family members' lives, it would be up to me. I've been ready for years, but yesterday I decided to take some actions to prepare.
Both #sonOne and #sonTwo were once shooting instructors. It sounds like they're planning to put me through the training, then buy me a weapon.
It started at 06:00 US-Pacific, 09:00 US-Eastern. I joined at 08:00 US-Pacific, 11:00 US-Eastern. S (who joined at 12:00 US-Central, 13:00 US-Eastern) suspects that there were limited spaces available ... and that people who weren't in the meeting early enough lost their reservations so that spur of the moment attendees could join.
Magic buzzword bingo. Let's make "zero trust" a free space, since every vendor says it already.
We're all going zero trust, except for that Solarwinds security appliance inside everyone's networks that has privileged access to everything else (e.g., can use privileged usernames & passwords "so it can monitor better").
It could also be one's age and previous exposure. When I started drinking #coffee when I was in my early 40s, I could drink a pot of coffee as late as 21:00 and head immediately to bed afterward. No problem sleeping, despite a lifetime of such problems. Ten years later, I had to cut off both coffee and cola past 16:00 because even a small amount of caffeine would leave me with my heart racing and me not sleeping for most of the night, and the prior sleep issues had returned.
In the exhibit hall, there were prerecorded videos and documents promoting various vendors' "solutions", plus other federal agencies describing how they are handling certain IT issues.
Some parts were informative, but overall, there was a bit of that slimy salesperson feeling.
This is needful, so we can see what products HQ-IT will roll out over the next year or so. But there should also be training sandboxes available to TechTeam members.
I heard the name because a right-wing racist said he has jury duty next week and hoped to vote to acquit or convict based on the race of the accused ... and that he suspects RG's case may be the one he's being called for.
Likewise, they forget that I closed my account with a prepaid balance still in it, because I never intended (and still never intend) to have anything to do with them again.
If this sort of thing had happened against my country, I would in no way be asking for moderation in response. The perpetrating nation would deserve punishment severe enough to ensure they never again did such a thing. So my hoping that Israel doesn't escalate sufficiently to squelch Hamas' murders forever is hypocritical.
But it isn't just me. Mr Xi is a hypocrite. https://nu.federati.net/url/291944 [www reuters com] Does anyone imagine that China would not severely punish a nation that did such a thing?
So, yes. My hope that Israel does not respond to a genocidal attack with genocidal revenge is hypocrisy, and by hoping so, I'm putting myself in the company of some of the worst leaders on the planet.
And yet, I still want the two peoples to figure out how to live side by side in peace. Despite not wanting a genocide, I don't see how this is possible as long as Hamas continues to exist. And since a person's Hamas membership isn't immediately visible (via a uniform or insignia), I don't know how one could "surgically" excise Hamas without also killing lots of innocents.
This is a frustrating place to be in, but that's true of all political / national / ethnic / religious conflicts. The true story generally has deep roots that portray both sides in a negative light ... which is very different from the "heroes of light versus villains of darkness" portrayals that one always sees.
In 2018, while I was in Carolina #PR, I was walking 🚶♂️ quickly and whacked my foot against a piece of sidewalk sticking up because of tree roots. My foot 🦶 swelled up and stayed swollen for about a year and a half.
I guess it is not considered swelling anymore, since I have had to wear larger shoes 👞 ever since.
The recent swelling is different than the long term enlargement and soreness. Putting shoes on and taking them off was painful.