Mozilla has a petition asking Facebook to stop tracking people's browsing off the site unless they opt in to it. Frankly I think the solution is to remove the ability to track people across sites from the web entirely, but I signed the petition anyway. Facebook has taken a huge hit to their reputation, so now is a good time to be putting pressure on them to change their ways.
Not bad, eh? I got a new/old Rolleiflex twin-lens reflex camera and took it for a test spin last week. The negatives are so big and this film is so smooth, you can't even see the grain. Plus those old 50s cameras are built like tanks. They're a joy to shoot on.
Oh wow, you don't fuck around! Napalm Death are really metal. Do a lot of metal bands do tape releases these days? I buy new tapes at record stores without knowing what's on them and there seems to be a lot of heavy metal being published on cassette, which is weird because cassettes seem like such a twee medium.
♲ @Vacay (plu@mstdn.io): Penn doesn’t just swing and miss with his ambitious vocabulary; he swings and cracks a hole in reality as we know it, leaving us all unsure of the concept of a good sentence, how a novel should be structured and generally what makes sense any more.
“She sharted agave shimmering spirits and shifted shit-faced overboard.” It’s like beat poetry, just somehow worse. amp.theguardian.com/books/2018…
Agreed. I'd been hoping to rewatch the whole Moffat era end-to-end to try and get to grips with it, but I'm stuck in the Clara/Capaldi years. I just can't work up the will to care enough.
It's pretty grim. I remember liking the cliffhanger where you think it's all over but the Vardans go and the Sontarans show up out of nowhere. Plus it's one of the rare stories that explores the TARDIS. But yeah, it does all feel like padding and it's pretty execrable. And that Sontaran with the hilarious Cockney accent :P
They're all so bad. What's worse is trying to find one in common so you can actually talk to someone.
"Do you have Skype?" "No, do you have Signal?" "No, do you have Discord?" "No, do you have Matrix?" "WTF is that. Do you have Telegram?" "... Wanna just email?" "Yeah all right then."
All right, now to try out qutebrowser. I did actually try Links (with graphics) and thought it was quite promising, but it lacks tabs and something went wrong where I couldn't copy/paste, so maybe not. I might give it another go, though — I like the idea of a text-centric browser.
Ooh, have you seen the up-coming releases? I didn't know they were out yet so I don't know what the new privacy options will look like. My impression from that press release was that this hadn't been released yet.
In any case, privacy options are already configurable through extensions (like uBlock) and settings (like sending the Do Not Track header). What I don't know is why it's suddenly Mozilla's job to *own* all my privacy features and have "opinions" about them. I've been laboring under the misapprehension they're supposed to be making some kind of web browser.
In lieu of any acceptable third-party browsers, I am now going to browse the web using this DuckTales yo-yo from 1992. It's very private, totally untrackable, and doesn't have an opinion on anything except Scrooge McDuck.
[0]What? No, I don't want my browser to have an opinion, no more than I want my toaster or my toilet paper to have an opinion. I want Firefox to render the damn Web. I appreciate the thought, but privacy options should be configurable through settings and add-ons. Why am I suddenly buying into a whole corporate philosophy by just wanting to browse the Web?