Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Notices by bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop), page 2

  1. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 23-Jul-2018 09:19:34 EDT bhaugen bhaugen

    #activitypub

    Is there a full list of apps using the AP protocol? I don't mean AP site implementations like Mastadon and Pleroma, I mean specialized apps like:
    * https://joinpeertube.org/en/home/
    * https://medium.com/we-distribute/prismo-is-a-decentralized-link-sharing-app-powered-by-activitypub-f03bfe1cf935
    * https://github.com/deiu/solid-plume
    * https://pixelfed.social/
    * https://write.as/

    Are those accurate? Any others?

    In conversation Monday, 23-Jul-2018 09:19:34 EDT from social.coop permalink

    Attachments

    1. File without filename could not get a thumbnail source.
      Home · PeerTube
      from PeerTube
    2. File without filename could not get a thumbnail source.
      PixelFed
      from PixelFed
      Federated Image Sharing
    3. Prismo is a decentralized link-sharing app powered by ActivityPub
      from Medium
      Soon, the fediverse might have their own decentralized competitor to Reddit and Hacker News
    4. deiu/solid-plume
      from GitHub
      solid-plume - Plume, a Solid blog platform!
  2. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Saturday, 07-Jul-2018 10:20:13 EDT bhaugen bhaugen

    It's International Co-op Day!
    https://www.ica.coop/en/events/international-co-operative-day

    (Did somebody else post this before and I missed it?)

    In conversation Saturday, 07-Jul-2018 10:20:13 EDT from social.coop permalink
  3. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Jun-2018 12:14:01 EDT bhaugen bhaugen
    • Christine Lemmer-Webber
    • Mayel - ghost account
    • :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhop: :abunhd: :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy:

    @cwebber @mayel @kaniini

    I'd like to get some experience using Pleroma in my quest for an ActivityPub instance to use for economic networks. @mayel suggested social.coop which I like a lot.
    I am aware that the fediverse contains a bewildering variety of social contexts and conflicts, so I am asking for recommendations.

    In conversation Tuesday, 26-Jun-2018 12:14:01 EDT from social.coop permalink
  4. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Saturday, 23-Jun-2018 13:31:57 EDT bhaugen bhaugen
    in reply to
    • Antanicus
    • Mayel - ghost account
    • Lynn Foster

    @mayel @Antanicus @lynnfoster
    If we get them working with activitypub, might even be able to use them from here.
    We want a combination of social and economic networks.

    In conversation Saturday, 23-Jun-2018 13:31:57 EDT from social.coop permalink
  5. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Saturday, 23-Jun-2018 10:56:55 EDT bhaugen bhaugen
    • Christine Lemmer-Webber
    • Antanicus
    • Mayel - ghost account
    • ivan
    • Stephanie Rearick
    • Lynn Foster

    @cwebber @lynnfoster @Antanicus

    Should also tag @bernini who published that doc, and @mayel who is helping the project, and @StephR who is here from one of the interested user groups. We're all here in social.coop, brought here by @mayel

    In conversation Saturday, 23-Jun-2018 10:56:55 EDT from social.coop permalink
  6. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Saturday, 23-Jun-2018 09:43:58 EDT bhaugen bhaugen
    in reply to
    • Antanicus
    • Lynn Foster

    @Antanicus

    @lynnfoster and I developed the value accounting software with #Sensorica.
    This https://docs.opencoopecosystem.net/ is a follow-on project that is currently looking at #activitypub for connections between people, organizations, and flocks of apps.

    In conversation Saturday, 23-Jun-2018 09:43:58 EDT from social.coop permalink
  7. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Friday, 15-Jun-2018 11:41:10 EDT bhaugen bhaugen
    in reply to
    • Strypey
    • Lynn Foster

    @strypey

    I mean literally their own instance. Agent-centric architecture. You are always communicating from your own AP.

    Groups can be agents, too, and have their own AP, which you can federate with.

    "Your own AP" could be hosted by somebody else, but you are always you in the whole fediverse, if you want to be. And you can move your own AP to a different host or host it yourself if you want.

    @lynnfoster has been writing about this:
    https://www.loomio.org/d/3wDCtkoG/structuring-the-oae-around-agents
    https://www.loomio.org/d/Y8kHSzPE/activitypub-as-a-decentralized-oae-infrastructure-

    In conversation Friday, 15-Jun-2018 11:41:10 EDT from social.coop permalink

    Attachments

    1. Structuring the OAE around agents
      from Loomio
      All Agents All the Way Down.... This is another thought experiment for how to structure the Open App Ecosystem. The focus here is on economic activity, but it applies to everything people might want to include in an OAE. Feedback and discussion very welcome! What if we did a radically decentralized version structured around agents (people, organizations)? (This is not a new idea, has been thought about and worked on by others before. But this is to take those concepts and think about using them to structure a whole OAE - the one we are working towards here.) Every person would operate from their own Person node (which is a personal agent). Every organization/group would be an Organization node (an organizational agent). So the ecosystem centers around agents. Agents are connected to each other by various relationships or activities. Everything that happens is stored by all the agents that are involved, wherever they store their stuff. So, let's say Jim, Tibor, and Draft decide to create something together which they want to exchange with other people. Like some fig, pig, and goat pizza. Their Personal Agents will agree on the rules and plans for how to do it. They will need to create some kind of joint identity which will be an Organization node (which is an organizational agent), so that other Person nodes can order pizza from it, and so that their work and other contributions can be combined into the actual pizzas. Let's call it the Open Pizza Bistro. The Organization node could deploy Process Bots for each pizza that needs to be created, with the size and maybe some selected special ingredients or variation, like skip the pig and goat, we want vegan. On request from Jim, Tibor, or Draft, the Process Bot will list the work requirements for this and other upcoming orders. Each of the people will commit to which work they want to do. Since they are not employees, when they actually log their work (using the Process Bot), their work will be an economic transfer of resources from them to the Open Pizza Bistro. If (for example) Bob wants to exchange some dessert for some pizza, then all of the people who had transferred some work to the process of making that pizza will be due for a share of the dessert. Bob will need to order the pizza from some node, because it is not coming from Jim, Tibor, or Draft individually. And the organization could deploy a bot that takes orders. But sooner or later, some live people will need to do some live work, and maybe one of them will take orders, too, since bots can be a little too rigid about pizza order variations, and this dessert exchange idea might also confuse the bot, so Bob might want to connect with a human. Likewise, when it comes to ordering ingredients, and especially making agreements with ingredient suppliers, a bot might be too limited. So the Person nodes will need to act for the Organization node in many cases. So the people who created the organization will need to make some decisions about who can do what in representing the organization. This is similar to organizations in real life. An organization can have agency (make agreements with other agents, for example) but the agreements are always executed by people who are related to the organization. So Jim, Tibor, and Draft will need to decide who has what kind of role in the Open Pizza Bistro, so the Bistro can execute its agency. Notes There is no monolithic system here that Jim, Tibor, and Draft need to use. Each of them is always operating from their own personal node, hosted by them or a hosting service they choose. They probably each belong to several other organizations. From a personal node, the person could potentially see everything they are involved with - their work (job, freelance, for fun, to help out a community), their offers/requests/exchanges, their accounts of different kinds, their social network, etc. An operational system is composed of all of the resource flows or other connections among all the related nodes. Each organizational node will have in its database records of all of the economic and other events that happened in its scope. Each person node will have the same. It would be possible to look at larger pictures from some overview scope, for example, a bioregion. Or it would be possible to follow a chains of events to see where the wheat came from that went into the pizza, to see how local it was, and how much waste was created. Or to see what your friends are posting about. So, there wouldn't be lots of different platforms that want people to join them any more, except perhaps transitionally. There would be no NRP, no Odoo, no DigLife, no Communecter. (With all due respect of course!) All the great and useful functionality from those platform apps would be broken out into pieces that could be plugged into the decentralized agent-based apps so people could see and interact with others, either as part of an organization or not. (Like the DigLife bot and diagrams and the Communecter maps and a lot of the UI could still work.)
    2. ActivityPub as a decentralized OAE infrastructure?
      from Loomio
      Several of us have been looking more closely at ActivityPub (https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/#obj-id) as a mechanism for messaging between decentralized agents (people and organizations), as well as between apps. It currently is focused on social networks, but we think it shows a lot of promise in other directions too. We are focused on the economic aspects of an open app ecosystem in our discussions, and more integration of that with social aspects too. And focused on moving towards an agent-centric architecture, some definitions of that here https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/1/view/HCGmHSwjgSNEOONNPRLplA/CyJfwJFLO3RXcFysO0sGKmh4sGpiC4XRMVc5CE7Ozdw/. Here is an initial set of investigation and thoughts about how this could actually work. https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/view/oqXdr2rfGXO04U1UWo2CIiZoL1Z9lkNkhzF5jw6pZDk/. Feedback welcome!
  8. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Thursday, 14-Jun-2018 08:53:27 EDT bhaugen bhaugen
    in reply to
    • Antanicus
    • Adrian Cochrane
    • Graham

    @Graham_Mitchell @Antanicus @alcinnz

    The big diff of protocol vs platform is that several different platforms (as in different apps using the same protocol) are now federated right here using the same protocol.

    If you want, for example, to have a cooperative economic system, it better use a protocol so all the cooperatives can interact with each other.

    In conversation Thursday, 14-Jun-2018 08:53:27 EDT from social.coop permalink
  9. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Thursday, 07-Jun-2018 16:07:56 EDT bhaugen bhaugen
    • Christine Lemmer-Webber
    • Mayel - ghost account
    • Stephanie Rearick

    @cwebber

    @mayel and one of @StephR 's gang are communing about ActivityPub right now, charging ahead, doing experiments, learning how it works...they'll feed back when it's time.

    In conversation Thursday, 07-Jun-2018 16:07:56 EDT from social.coop permalink
  10. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 04-Jun-2018 16:55:59 EDT bhaugen bhaugen
    in reply to
    • Alex@rtnVFRmedia Suffolk UK
    • jjg
    • Alex Cendre 🌋
    • Mayel - ghost account
    • gabe 👍

    @alxcndr @vfrmedia @jjg @mayel @gabe

    https://p2pfoundation.net/ is anti-capitalist and emerged from open-source practices in one way or another. Likewise FairCoop. Probly more, but those came to mind immediately.

    In conversation Monday, 04-Jun-2018 16:55:59 EDT from social.coop permalink

    Attachments

    1. Home Page
      By admin from P2P Foundation
      The P2P Foundation is a non-profit organization and global network dedicated to advocacy and research of commons-oriented peer to peer dynamics solutions.
  11. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 04-Jun-2018 11:14:01 EDT bhaugen bhaugen

    Re #decentralization: it won't necessarily fix the economic system.

    See libertarians and anarcho-capitalists.

    We might get from-each-according-to-ability but we won't necessarily get to-each-according-to-need.

    But I do think it is a necessary corrective at this stage and opens the field for more cooperation on better stuff.

    In conversation Monday, 04-Jun-2018 11:14:01 EDT from social.coop permalink
  12. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Sunday, 03-Jun-2018 09:57:11 EDT bhaugen bhaugen

    Word of caution: git-ssb works very differently from github/gitlab et al.
    Would take some getting used to.

    I'm asking for tips in SSB and will pass on anything that seems useful, if anybody wants.

    In conversation Sunday, 03-Jun-2018 09:57:11 EDT from social.coop permalink
  13. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Sunday, 03-Jun-2018 07:51:12 EDT bhaugen bhaugen
    in reply to
    • Eugen
    • h
    • Mayel - ghost account
    • Björn Schießle 🌍 🇪🇺
    • Matt Noyes
    • Christina Hendricks
    • /^xj9?$/

    @mayel @xj @bjoern @clhendricksbc @Gargron @h @Matt_Noyes

    An article about how capitalist attempts at collaboration defeat themselves:
    https://www.academia.edu/10252910/The_uneasy_transition_from_supply_chains_to_ecosystems_The_value-creation_value-capture_dilemma

    Would seem possible for cooperatives of cooperatives to do better. But cooperatives sometimes fail to cooperate deeply with each other. Actually not easy to do so and still maintain focus on your own purpose. How to develop ecosystems of cooperatives? Anybody doing it?

    In conversation Sunday, 03-Jun-2018 07:51:12 EDT from social.coop permalink

    Attachments

    1. The uneasy transition from supply chains to ecosystems The value-creation/value-capture dilemma
      The uneasy transition from supply chains to ecosystems The value-creation/value-capture dilemma
  14. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Sunday, 03-Jun-2018 06:24:32 EDT bhaugen bhaugen

    Re #Microsoft eating #GitHub -

    one more alternative: #git-ssb
    For "using git collaboratively without a central, closed-source point of origin"

    https://github.com/noffle/git-ssb-intro
    https://git.scuttlebot.io/

    In conversation Sunday, 03-Jun-2018 06:24:32 EDT from social.coop permalink

    Attachments

    1. noffle/git-ssb-intro
      from GitHub
      git-ssb-intro - :wrench: Learn git-ssb: a decentralized GitHub alternative.
  15. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Wednesday, 30-May-2018 11:04:37 EDT bhaugen bhaugen
    • Christine Lemmer-Webber
    • Mayel - ghost account

    @cwebber
    @mayel
    Now that I have semi-settled on ActivityPub as a direction, I am of course being sent criticisms:
    https://medium.com/we-distribute/got-zot-mike-macgirvin-45287601ff19

    I'll learn about all those details over time. Am not worried about the direction.

    But all clarifying comments are welcome...

    In conversation Wednesday, 30-May-2018 11:04:37 EDT from social.coop permalink
  16. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Thursday, 10-May-2018 12:27:14 EDT bhaugen bhaugen
    in reply to
    • Mayel - ghost account
    • Sean R. Lynch ☑️
    • ivan

    @seanl @mayel @bernini
    The rough theory behind this is what the P2P Foundation called "mutual coordination economics", or what Holochain calls "agent-centric", or what Greg Cassell calls "agreement-oriented organization".

    In conversation Thursday, 10-May-2018 12:27:14 EDT from social.coop permalink
  17. bhaugen (bhaugen@social.coop)'s status on Thursday, 10-May-2018 10:46:15 EDT bhaugen bhaugen
    • Mayel - ghost account
    • ivan

    #introduction

    I've been working since about 1995 on an #omegaproject to develop the software required for a something that I see in the hashtags here might be called a #solidarityeconomy.

    Most recently working with @mayel and @bernini and others on an #openappecosystem using the #valueflows vocabulary and protocols.

    Some relevant links:
    http://mikorizal.org/
    https://www.valueflo.ws/
    https://www.loomio.org/g/exAKrBUp/open-app-ecosystem
    https://www.opencoopecosystem.net/
    What is an omega project:
    https://vimeopro.com/andyet/andyet-conf/video/175370577

    In conversation Thursday, 10-May-2018 10:46:15 EDT from social.coop permalink

    Attachments

    1. Open App Ecosystem
      from Loomio
      Welcome ! This is a neutral group to talk about how we can build a suite of interoperable, open source tools which support transparent, democratic, and decentralized organizing. It's not a working group, but becomes a resource where all creators can gather to exchange information about their projects and practices. Also, if you have an idea or if you want to work on something concrete you can start discussing it here. At some point it's good to create your own loomio's group (or whatever you want to use) to work on your project. Don't hesitate to go on this github page (https://github.com/open-app/core) to know more about it.
  • After
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.