Notices by beatrix bitrot (bea@glitch.social), page 7

@idesofmerch 😬

@idesofmerch such a bummer

@Are0h here it is

http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/4/eaap8469.full

I really enjoyed it and I hope you do too

@Are0h good read, thanks. I really like this kind of research, though I don't read it that often. Did you see the paper I posted a while back about the study that was done (mostly) in Chinese Starbucks?

@masklayer June... 9th......?

@LANthus @thornyonmain I believe it but also barely have it in me to play games at all any more so... 🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷

@LANthus @thornyonmain returns. I played it but never ended up trying the others cause meh

@somarasu yes? Maybe?

Depends how well you understand the problem?

There could be something subtle and important that you miss by not studying what's there, seeing why stuff was done certain ways

Course that kinda stuff can be easy to miss even if you do read it

I think if you know the problem well and the odds are good you'll produce a working solution quickly, then the old code is maybe more liability than benefit

If you don't, you may have to rewrite more than once or screw around a lot

@Trev fucking real. rooting for you

@Trev bad

@Trev users is the best testers

@kibi ahh gotcha

@kibi who else is doing this though?

@kibi ha right!

@kibi ???

@TheGibson @Elizafox get the fuck out of my memtoiomns

.................................

plain weave? basket weave? twill weave?!?!?!?