@pnathan Stallman is definitely eccentric, but on all the main points he was right. Before Snowden many people didn't believe that government surveillance was a problem, or that only "the bad people" would be spied on. The reasons why software needed to be free also didn't become clear until the abuses of the software industry started to become obvious.
@maiyannah@HerraBRE There's an old Moxie talk in which he describes the various problems with CAs. At the time his proposal was to use a consensus mechanism instead which was more like a web-of-trust idea.
That never caught on, but I'm pretty sure that what we've had for the last 20+ years isn't the last word in web transport security. Probably better is possible. But of course the browser makers are the ultimate deciders as to what kinds of security mechanisms get deployed.
@kurtm@Gargron This is another "if only ad revenue actually got delivered to users" thing.
Advertising is toxic for social networks. It leads to Facebook and Twitter with their algorithmic timelines and centralization. Advertising is why Google is as bad as it is. The fediverse doesn't need advertising to be viable, and this is perhaps a bit terrifying to the marketing people and the politicos who just want to be able to directly buy influence.
@lnxw48a1 My scorching hot take on this is just to leave the hiveway instance to it. Block it if you want. Certainly don't buy any "tokens" or whatever because this is probably yet another ICO scam with no serious intention of being viable. It seems unlikely that the proposed business model could work, even if they defederated and became a silo.
A couple of years or more ago when the fediverse was a twee world of Free Software enthusiasts advisory privacy might have been ok, but as the fediverse grows and includes more admins with less than honorable intentions this could become more of a problem.
For example, ignoring the advisory privacy could allow rogue admins to then sell "private" data to other parties or dubious agencies for a requisite handling fee. When you don't have cryptographic controls this type of thing could happen.
@Antanicus Also these right wing memes, like "trickle down", don't operate at the level of data and analytics. They operate at the level of plausible narratives.
To someone who is naive the idea of trickle down sounds kinda plausible. Sure, rich people are bastards, we all know that, but they must also go shopping and so their money must get partly transferred to other workers, blah blah and so on (in ลฝiลพek voice). These kinds of narratives have "truthiness" to them, even though they may be mostly untrue and not supported by any economic analysis.
@nigeldgreen@devurandom One of the big hegemonic projects worth taking on is to try to move everyday language out of the consumerist mode. In particular to stop describing everything as a market.
non-free software has security properties which are not independently verifiable, so there is a non-trivial probability that any security claims made about such software will be false. No matter how much the user twiddles with settings if the closed codebase is evil then they're merely engaging in security theatrics or "feelgood computing".