Jonkman Microblog
  • Login
Show Navigation

  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Timeline for administrator list by bobjonkman, page 61

Bob Jonkman bobjonkman administrator Thursday, 29-Nov-0001 18:42:28 LMT
  • Subscribe
Listed 1 Subscribers 0
  1. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Sunday, 03-Dec-2017 13:35:18 EST Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
    in reply to
    • Bob Jonkman
    s/autonomous vehicles/*non* autonomous vehicles/ What's wrong with me today? #InsufficientCaffeination
    In conversation Sunday, 03-Dec-2017 13:35:18 EST from web permalink
  2. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Sunday, 03-Dec-2017 13:33:58 EST Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
    in reply to
    • Bob Mottram
    I'm hoping for the inverse -- where autonomous vehicles will be restricted to their own lanes so they don't interfere with the efficient traffic. Kind of like the slow lane. #DumbLane
    In conversation Sunday, 03-Dec-2017 13:33:58 EST from web permalink
  3. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Saturday, 02-Dec-2017 11:42:47 EST Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
    in reply to
    • ghostdancer
    @ghostdancer Welcome to capitalism, an evolutionary system to maximize profit.
    In conversation Saturday, 02-Dec-2017 11:42:47 EST from mustard permalink
  4. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Friday, 01-Dec-2017 14:06:19 EST Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
    • Humor
    I'm reading far too many of these in one sitting. !humor http://maximumble.thebookofbiff.com/2016/03/08/1286-felafel/ https://gs.jonkman.ca/attachment/28851
    In conversation Friday, 01-Dec-2017 14:06:19 EST from web permalink

    Attachments

  5. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Friday, 01-Dec-2017 03:04:43 EST Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
    in reply to
    • deutrino
    That was a fun thread on #Twitter until the haters showed up. #ClickHere
    In conversation Friday, 01-Dec-2017 03:04:43 EST from web permalink
  6. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Friday, 01-Dec-2017 02:17:53 EST Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
    in reply to
    • Bob Jonkman
    • wire ☑ (not the messaging app)
    Not the @Wire I was thinking of. Need enforced fully-qualified user names, dammit!
    In conversation Friday, 01-Dec-2017 02:17:53 EST from web permalink
  7. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Friday, 01-Dec-2017 02:16:45 EST Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
    in reply to
    • wire ☑ (not the messaging app)
    • stragu
    @Wire has published their server source with an AGPL 3.0 license. But apparently build instructions are lacking, so I'm not sure if it's actually possible to build a working server. https://github.com/wireapp/wire-server/blob/develop/LICENSE
    In conversation Friday, 01-Dec-2017 02:16:45 EST from web permalink

    Attachments

    1. wireapp/wire-server
      from GitHub
      wire-server - 🇪🇺 Wire back-end services
  8. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Friday, 01-Dec-2017 02:08:28 EST Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
    in reply to
    • stragu
    CC licenses do not supersede Fair Use or Fair Dealing. Even if a work is licensed CC-NC (Non Commercial) then, for example, a for-profit newspaper can still use it if it falls under the "newsworthy" fair use or fair dealing.
    In conversation Friday, 01-Dec-2017 02:08:28 EST from web permalink
  9. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Friday, 01-Dec-2017 02:06:41 EST Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
    in reply to
    • Bob Jonkman
    Changing a CC license to something more restrictive is ineffective (and I'm not sure everyone understands that). If it can be shown that a more permissive license existed when I used it, then I can share my copy out again under that license, even if the creator has changed the license to something else.
    In conversation Friday, 01-Dec-2017 02:06:41 EST from web permalink
  10. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Friday, 01-Dec-2017 02:06:07 EST Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
    in reply to
    • Mark A. Gibbs
    Ratcheting down copyright restrictions (or increasing CC permissions) over time seems like a reasonable compromise. You can always grant more liberal permission, either individually or in general, but once you've released something with a particular CC license that level of permission is irrevocable. https://creativecommons.org/faq/#what-if-i-change-my-mind-about-using-a-cc-license
    In conversation Friday, 01-Dec-2017 02:06:07 EST from web permalink
  11. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Thursday, 30-Nov-2017 22:17:22 EST Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
    in reply to
    • stragu
    I think you're right. CC-NC-ND is OK for redistributing, but no good for using in your own projects.
    In conversation Thursday, 30-Nov-2017 22:17:22 EST from web permalink
  12. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Thursday, 30-Nov-2017 12:40:23 EST Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
    in reply to
    • Bob Jonkman
    #ShowYourDesktop ...and with a bit of content: https://gs.jonkman.ca/attachment/28424
    In conversation Thursday, 30-Nov-2017 12:40:23 EST from web permalink

    Attachments

  13. Bob Jonkman (bobjonkman@gs.jonkman.ca)'s status on Thursday, 30-Nov-2017 12:39:38 EST Bob Jonkman Bob Jonkman
    #ShowYourDesktop What a fun idea! (two monitors, the left in portrait mode) https://gs.jonkman.ca/attachment/28423
    In conversation Thursday, 30-Nov-2017 12:39:38 EST from web permalink

    Attachments

  • After
  • Before
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Jonkman Microblog is a social network, courtesy of SOBAC Microcomputer Services. It runs on GNU social, version 1.2.0-beta5, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Jonkman Microblog content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to desktop site layout.