This is missing from these discussions all the time, perhaps because it's one of the less obvious (but more sinister) issues with the Microfacegoopple.
"The European Parliament has proposed amended regulation that would not only require end-to-end encryption when available, but forbid backdoors that offer guaranteed access to law enforcement. EU residents need to know that the "confidentiality and safety" of their data is "guaranteed," according to the draft, and backdoors risk "weakening" that privacy."
However, while criticizing Congress for their lack of tech-savviness is justified, it should not obscure the fact that Facebook and other tech giants are *exploiting it maliciously*.
Should Congress get up to speed with tech? Yes.
Is this the main issue here? Absolutely not, and we need to put the spotlight back on Mr Zuckerberg.
@lain I'm sorry, but that's a completely different thing.
I don't think anyone is saying everyone should be *pushed* to higher education. Don't want? That's fine.
Instead, what at least I am saying, is: if they want to, they should have to take a crippling debt on to do so, even if we're talking philosophy, japanese studies or art.
It's like with science funding: you *never* know which path leads to a great discovery. So don't limit the paths people can take.
This is silly. I do really believe we can have an informed discussion about: - federated protocols; - how they should handle CWs, blocks, etc; - how we can/should handle trolls and other not-excellent-people in the Fediverse; - etc, etc;
without generalizations and stereotyping users based on software they happen to be using.
It's really not "Mastodon vs Pleroma vs GNU/Social".
"Ryan said the vulnerability appeared to stem from an "oversight around assumptions of who would be able to communicate with the card." The assumption seemed to be that "if someone got hold of your card, they would never try to pair the card over Bluetooth and download the data.""
"Current EU Copyright Review threatens Free and Open Source Software. Take action now to preserve the ability to collaboratively build software online!"
@crowd42 "Among those killed was Yaser Murtaja, a 30-year old Palestinian photographer, who was shot in the stomach by an Israeli sniper despite wearing a jacket emblazoned with 'PRESS' to identify him as a journalist."
Best part: "A T-Mobile Austria representative said that "there is a misunderstanding in this thread about how we store and what is being displayed for customer service agents. I will check with our security officer and get back to you." But didn't immediately follow-up."
@Shamar@alcinnz@ebel@pettter@HerraBRE@bjoern@galaxis@alanz here's a couple of other p2p communication projects that might be interesting: Twister (BitTorrent/Blockchain based social network), Tox (encrypted p2p IM and audio/video calls), Briar (end-to-end encrypted Tor-based IM with forums and blogs), Retroshare (too many features to even list)
@pettter@HerraBRE@bjoern what completely flabbergasts me in this discussion is that instead of asking "how can we make this happen", most people seem to be looking for reasons this would never work.
I feel this approach is not going to move us forward.
I also feel that (quoting Eben Moglen, I think), the server must die to save the web. As long as we have servers, we will have centralization.
Peer-to-peer, end-to-end principle (in the revolutionary, "serverless" sense) is what we need back.